“People ask me: Why don’t you comment about where COVID came from? And I say: I haven’t seen it with my own eyes..how can I say where it came from?” Well now the door is part way open. Read on...
The virus' possession of the patented furin cleavage site in the spike protein bothers me a lot. It has terrible effects upon our immune system.
But what bothers me much more is deliberately using the spike protein as a self-replicating, unmetered vaccine. Repeatedly vaccinating people (boosters). It is a colossal error in judgment I have been unable to wrap my head around. 🤯 It makes more sense to me as malevolent intent. 🤢
Can you explain how it has terrible effects upon the immune system? Will our cells produce MSHC when infected or vaccinated since it contains the sequence to do so? I have no medical background but trying to understand what the effects of this patented sequence are.
What do you mean "self-replicating"? To my knowledge, the current mRNA vaccines do not have the ability to self replicate.
Ok. I am not qualified to explain anything medical. I don't mind being wrong, but I greatly dislike misleading people. 🙂
That said, we have to start somewhere. This next video is not about the mRNA vaccines, but about the effects of the virus itself on our body (without the use of early treatment protocols, not considered). This video is pro-vaccine.
It is important to understand "the devil" the pro vaccine crowd is running from. The dangers of the vaccine is another issue. Most people cannot handle considering both the virus and the vaccine are both dangerous. The betrayal by government and medical authorities is too great to accept and "think it through." (The safe and effective mantra.)
What I meant by "self-replicating" is the dose-size of spike protein stimulating an immune response cannot be precisely regulated. With a typical vaccine, the amount of virus nanoparticles the body is exposed to is pre-measured precisely in the vaccine. But using mRNA technology this way in a vaccine, the body continously manufactures the toxic spike protein within its own cells. It is a "transfection," like an infection. Where parts of the vaccinated individual's body is at war with itself.
I think your question about MSH3 concerns the stability of the vaccine mRNA, and how our body transcribes vaccine mRNA into potential single strand DNA. And how these products interfere with our body's natural DNA repair processes. 🙂
I forgot the video link. 🤦♂️
The T-cells are not alright - an interview with Dr. Anthony Leonardi, T-cell researcher
Sounds like you are conflating many different studies. But I agree that both vaccine and infection are dangerous as they both produce the Spike protein. This article seems to answer some of my questions regarding the implications of MSH3 sequence - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full#B15 - the problem is I don’t understand most of the terminology and mechanisms they describe so it would be nice for Dr. Been to go over those in more detail
It would be nice if Dr. Mobeen would go over the details more in a video explanation. But a clear explanation is probably something the governments and YouTube want to keep people from seeing. 🤔
I also read this - I'm hesitant to believe anything from the "fact checkers" but Moreno Colaiacovo, a bioinformatician said " if we translate the sequence using a tool like ExPASy translate, we notice that the short sequence does not encode for PRRAR (Dr. Mobeen says it does) in this protein, but rather YVPAE (which is not a furin cleavage site). The translation is from 5' to 3' in frame". So was Dr. Mobeen mistaken when he said that they encode the same amino acids? The identical sequence is definitely there, no one seems to dispute that. However, unlike Dr. Mobeen who believes that our cells will over express the MSH3 protein, they say that since the homology was in the antisense direction it is pointless because it will encode a different peptide sequence. Who is correct?
Ok. I think we aren't going to get certainty about anything for the time being. I watched this Russell Brand video yesterday. It reminded me it is hard to get to the truth when people are trying to hide it. It is more like a trial in court where the defense is creating doubts, not trying to get to the truth.
That's not really what I'm talking about. I just want to know why/how the cell would produce the MSH3 protein based off of the 19 nucleotide sequence. He briefly talks about and says something about the fact that when the virus replicates there will be tons of the "sequence" produced so the cell will "overexpress" MSH3. My question is why would it do that? Like I said, I have no idea how this stuff works but from the knowledge I've been able to gain from Dr. Mobeen and some reading I thought that there are specific codons that begin and end the translation of a protein. Wouldn't the ribosome translate the full spike protein based on where the start and end codons are..how would the MSH3 protein be made when it's sequence is in the middle of another proteins sequence?? I just need someone to explain how this works biologically because I'm not understanding it :)
I honestly don't know the details that control when genes express and when they are suppressed. I have heard things like methmethylation, for example, can change protein expression. I actually don't have the free time to read the relevant literature to figure it out. 😬
I'm surprised Dr. Been did not mention lab origin angle here. See the Nerd Has Power article "RaTG13 – the undeniable evidence that the Wuhan coronavirus is man-made." It was a big deal back in May 2020. https://nerdhaspower.weebly.com/ratg13-is-fake.html
I agree with Bill if this occurred in nature it is not eligible for a patent. Dr. Mobeen mentioned that the initial discovery of the FCS on the SARS-CoV-2 spoke protein was made in April 2020 ... The furin site on the spike is only found in one other beta coronavirus MERS. They also found that feature may “provide a gain of function” to the virus for efficient spreading in the human population.
I wonder if the MERS furin site on the spike is an exact copy of the furin spike on SARS-CoV-2? MERS was discovered in Saudi Arabia in 2012 so it came first and is the first Corona virus that I am aware of that gained function into humans. According to the World Health Organization MERS had a 35% fatality rate. https://www.who.int/health-topics/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-mers#tab=tab_1
I believe if a virus is too deadly, it may not reach as many people because of high death counts.
What is the mechanism for how this could occur? If the full sequence codes for the Spike protein and not MSH3 why is this a problem? Is it possible for the cells to produce proteins using a portion of another proteins RNA?
Thanks, Dr. Mobeen. 🙂
The virus' possession of the patented furin cleavage site in the spike protein bothers me a lot. It has terrible effects upon our immune system.
But what bothers me much more is deliberately using the spike protein as a self-replicating, unmetered vaccine. Repeatedly vaccinating people (boosters). It is a colossal error in judgment I have been unable to wrap my head around. 🤯 It makes more sense to me as malevolent intent. 🤢
Can you explain how it has terrible effects upon the immune system? Will our cells produce MSHC when infected or vaccinated since it contains the sequence to do so? I have no medical background but trying to understand what the effects of this patented sequence are.
What do you mean "self-replicating"? To my knowledge, the current mRNA vaccines do not have the ability to self replicate.
Ok. I am not qualified to explain anything medical. I don't mind being wrong, but I greatly dislike misleading people. 🙂
That said, we have to start somewhere. This next video is not about the mRNA vaccines, but about the effects of the virus itself on our body (without the use of early treatment protocols, not considered). This video is pro-vaccine.
It is important to understand "the devil" the pro vaccine crowd is running from. The dangers of the vaccine is another issue. Most people cannot handle considering both the virus and the vaccine are both dangerous. The betrayal by government and medical authorities is too great to accept and "think it through." (The safe and effective mantra.)
What I meant by "self-replicating" is the dose-size of spike protein stimulating an immune response cannot be precisely regulated. With a typical vaccine, the amount of virus nanoparticles the body is exposed to is pre-measured precisely in the vaccine. But using mRNA technology this way in a vaccine, the body continously manufactures the toxic spike protein within its own cells. It is a "transfection," like an infection. Where parts of the vaccinated individual's body is at war with itself.
I think your question about MSH3 concerns the stability of the vaccine mRNA, and how our body transcribes vaccine mRNA into potential single strand DNA. And how these products interfere with our body's natural DNA repair processes. 🙂
I forgot the video link. 🤦♂️
The T-cells are not alright - an interview with Dr. Anthony Leonardi, T-cell researcher
112K views · 1 month ago
1:30:44
https://youtu.be/jCWfytQXpEs
Sounds like you are conflating many different studies. But I agree that both vaccine and infection are dangerous as they both produce the Spike protein. This article seems to answer some of my questions regarding the implications of MSH3 sequence - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full#B15 - the problem is I don’t understand most of the terminology and mechanisms they describe so it would be nice for Dr. Been to go over those in more detail
🙂 Yes.
It would be nice if Dr. Mobeen would go over the details more in a video explanation. But a clear explanation is probably something the governments and YouTube want to keep people from seeing. 🤔
I also read this - I'm hesitant to believe anything from the "fact checkers" but Moreno Colaiacovo, a bioinformatician said " if we translate the sequence using a tool like ExPASy translate, we notice that the short sequence does not encode for PRRAR (Dr. Mobeen says it does) in this protein, but rather YVPAE (which is not a furin cleavage site). The translation is from 5' to 3' in frame". So was Dr. Mobeen mistaken when he said that they encode the same amino acids? The identical sequence is definitely there, no one seems to dispute that. However, unlike Dr. Mobeen who believes that our cells will over express the MSH3 protein, they say that since the homology was in the antisense direction it is pointless because it will encode a different peptide sequence. Who is correct?
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/short-identical-gene-sequence-sars-cov-2-and-gene-sequence-patented-moderna-found-in-other-organisms-not-evidence-virus-engineered-daily-mail/
Ok. I think we aren't going to get certainty about anything for the time being. I watched this Russell Brand video yesterday. It reminded me it is hard to get to the truth when people are trying to hide it. It is more like a trial in court where the defense is creating doubts, not trying to get to the truth.
It All Makes Sense Now
904K views · 15 hours ago
17:58
https://youtu.be/yXcNACtRs-s
It would be nice to have the records of research that the NIH had, so people like Dr. Mobeen could piece it together.
That's not really what I'm talking about. I just want to know why/how the cell would produce the MSH3 protein based off of the 19 nucleotide sequence. He briefly talks about and says something about the fact that when the virus replicates there will be tons of the "sequence" produced so the cell will "overexpress" MSH3. My question is why would it do that? Like I said, I have no idea how this stuff works but from the knowledge I've been able to gain from Dr. Mobeen and some reading I thought that there are specific codons that begin and end the translation of a protein. Wouldn't the ribosome translate the full spike protein based on where the start and end codons are..how would the MSH3 protein be made when it's sequence is in the middle of another proteins sequence?? I just need someone to explain how this works biologically because I'm not understanding it :)
I honestly don't know the details that control when genes express and when they are suppressed. I have heard things like methmethylation, for example, can change protein expression. I actually don't have the free time to read the relevant literature to figure it out. 😬
I’ve enjoyed Marc Girardot’s Substack explaining what you are saying here in great detail. Thank you for this link, Chris.
I'm surprised Dr. Been did not mention lab origin angle here. See the Nerd Has Power article "RaTG13 – the undeniable evidence that the Wuhan coronavirus is man-made." It was a big deal back in May 2020. https://nerdhaspower.weebly.com/ratg13-is-fake.html
See also Rossana Segreto and DRASTIC: https://twitter.com/Rossana38510044/status/1312412241615097856
And Uri Deigin: https://medium.com/@yurideigin/lab-made-cov2-genealogy-through-the-lens-of-gain-of-function-research-f96dd7413748
Will you consider discussing the together trial?
Thank you for this review Dr Mobeen.
The virus should be charged with patent infringement. 😋 Or the patent invalidated as occuring in nature which is not eligible for patent protection.
I agree with Bill if this occurred in nature it is not eligible for a patent. Dr. Mobeen mentioned that the initial discovery of the FCS on the SARS-CoV-2 spoke protein was made in April 2020 ... The furin site on the spike is only found in one other beta coronavirus MERS. They also found that feature may “provide a gain of function” to the virus for efficient spreading in the human population.
I wonder if the MERS furin site on the spike is an exact copy of the furin spike on SARS-CoV-2? MERS was discovered in Saudi Arabia in 2012 so it came first and is the first Corona virus that I am aware of that gained function into humans. According to the World Health Organization MERS had a 35% fatality rate. https://www.who.int/health-topics/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-mers#tab=tab_1
I believe if a virus is too deadly, it may not reach as many people because of high death counts.
What is the mechanism for how this could occur? If the full sequence codes for the Spike protein and not MSH3 why is this a problem? Is it possible for the cells to produce proteins using a portion of another proteins RNA?