My guess is vaccine induced immune escape, negative efficacy, anti body dependant enhancement of disease and infection, immune mimicry, imprinting and refocussing, increasing diminution of DNA damage repair, cytokine storm and a subverted immune system, VAIDS, reverse transcription of vaccine spike protein into DNA and Graphene oxide. This is the result of a synthetic, cytotoxic, lipid nanoparticle, furin cleavage site spike protein. Maintain the Truth.
Dr Been, to be clear, the graph you show which shows the incremental reduction of risk depending on previous infection shows that there is stll an over 90% risk of severe outcomes for all groups, it is just that the time from infection to booster incrementally lowers risk by 0.* percent each time, not going from over 90% to suddenly dropping to 0.*%
I think that is key to point out, because it seems like the risk of getting boosters drops risk from over 90% to less than 1%, which is not the case.
My guess is vaccine induced immune escape, negative efficacy, anti body dependant enhancement of disease and infection, immune mimicry, imprinting and refocussing, increasing diminution of DNA damage repair, cytokine storm and a subverted immune system, VAIDS, reverse transcription of vaccine spike protein into DNA and Graphene oxide. This is the result of a synthetic, cytotoxic, lipid nanoparticle, furin cleavage site spike protein. Maintain the Truth.
Dr Been, to be clear, the graph you show which shows the incremental reduction of risk depending on previous infection shows that there is stll an over 90% risk of severe outcomes for all groups, it is just that the time from infection to booster incrementally lowers risk by 0.* percent each time, not going from over 90% to suddenly dropping to 0.*%
I think that is key to point out, because it seems like the risk of getting boosters drops risk from over 90% to less than 1%, which is not the case.